In moments of national strain, perception often outruns truth. President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s recent visit to London has triggered a familiar storm. Questions about priorities, criticism of optics, and renewed doubts about his past. For many Nigerians, the anger is not abstract; it is rooted in lived hardship—rising food prices, insecurity, and economic uncertainty. Yet, if we are to judge leadership fairly, we must resist the temptation to reduce governance to viral outrage.
The question is not whether Nigerians are justified in their frustrations. They are. The question is whether those frustrations accurately reflect the totality of what is happening.
Take the recurring argument about Tinubu’s qualification. This issue has travelled through the highest legal corridors in the land. It has been tested politically and judicially. It is no longer a matter of speculation but of record.
Beyond that, Tinubu’s pre-political career offers a different lens: a man who rose within the demanding corporate structure of global institutions, including Deloitte and Mobil, where he held senior financial responsibilities. These are not ceremonial roles; they are positions entrusted to individuals with proven competence, discipline, and strategic thinking.
Tunji Disu, Oyedele: Revving up the governance engine
Foreign Policy and the Politicisation of Ambassadorial Appointments by the Tinubu Administration
History itself teaches us humility in judging leadership by formal education alone. Abraham Lincoln and Andrew Johnson led the United States with minimal formal schooling, yet their impact remains indelible. Leadership, ultimately, is not a certificate—it is capacity.
On the London trip, critics ask: why travel when Nigerians are bleeding? It is a fair emotional question, but governance is rarely a single-lane responsibility. A president must simultaneously confront insecurity at home and secure economic lifelines abroad. The visit was not without substance. A £746 million export finance deal for the modernization of Apapa and Tin Can Island ports was secured. Here is an intervention that could significantly reduce congestion, improve trade efficiency, and lower the cost of doing business in Nigeria.
In addition, fintech expansion, banking partnerships, and trade access agreements under the UK’s Developing Countries Trading Scheme open doors for Nigerian businesses in global markets.
These are not abstract gains. They are the quiet building blocks of economic recovery.
Recent macroeconomic indicators suggest that the foundation is beginning to stabilise. GDP growth has edged above 4%, inflation. Although it is still painful but it has shown signs of easing, and capital inflows have increased significantly. Investor confidence, once severely eroded, is gradually returning. These are early signals, not final victories. But they matter.
Yet, statistics do not cook meals or secure villages. This is where the administration must move with urgency. The greatest vulnerability of the current government is not lack of policy direction but the slow translation of macroeconomic gains into everyday relief. Nigerians want to feel the change, not read about it.
Security remains the most sensitive fault line. While efforts such as increased recruitment into the armed forces and renewed discussions around state policing signal intent, the reality on the ground still breeds fear.
The proposed decentralisation of policing, if properly structured, offers a historic opportunity. State police could bring intelligence closer to the communities, improve response times, and enhance accountability. But it must be designed with strong safeguards to prevent political misuse.
Equally critical is the daily experience of Nigerians with state institutions. From police checkpoints to customs barriers, extortion has become an unspoken tax on survival. No reform will feel real until this is confronted decisively. Transparency tools, digital reporting systems, and visible disciplinary actions must become standard.
The truth, then, lies somewhere between the extremes. Tinubu is not the helpless leader his critics portray, nor is he beyond reproach. He is a reformer navigating a difficult transition. A transition that demands both patience and pressure.
Nigeria stands at a delicate crossroads. The choices being made now on economic restructuring, institutional reform, and security architecture will shape the country for decades.
The duty of leadership is to deliver results. The duty of citizens is to demand them, but also to discern truth from noise.
In the end, governance must not only be defended. It must be felt.
