Don’t abort our mandate again, Group tells Obasanjo

334

Obasanjo

 

Conscience of the Yoruba, a socio cultural group in the South West geo- political zone has called on former President Olusegun Obasanjo not to abort the peoples will again as demonstrated in last Saturdays election.

In a statement by Abagun Kole Omololu,the group drew attention to statement credited to the former President calling for the cancellation of the election asking him to perish the thought.

Full statement below:

Our attention was drawn to the February 27, 2023 statement of former President

Olusegun Obasanjo about the 2023 presidential election. In his two-page statement,

Obasanjo called for the cancellation of some election results that failed credibility and

transparency tests. With a sense of responsibility, we, in the Conscience of the Yoruba

Nation, asked Chief Obasanjo to perish that thought.

In a similar intervention too, former Head of State and Chairman of National Peace

Committee, Gen. Abdulsalam Abubakar challenged the Independent National Electoral

Commission (INEC) to pay attention to irregularities and malpractices that allegedly

characterised the 2023 president election.

We receive the statements of the two elder statesmen with utter disappointment,

especially at a time when all Nigerians – at home and in the diaspora – are anxiously

awaiting the outcome of the process, which different foreign observation missions have

relatively adjudged credible and transparent.

 

Specifically, Obasanjo’s statement is nothing, but a call for undue interference in the

constitutional responsibilities of the INEC. Under the 1999 Constitution and 2022

Electoral Act, the election process is clear. The laws give INEC the exclusive power to

perform its functions without interference from any person, institution or any arm of

government.

INEC was still preoccupied with its responsibilities when Obasanjo called for the

cancellation of the process. We seriously take exception to this position, which we

strongly believe, is antithetical to the peripheral, strategic and vital interests of Nigeria.

It is on record that Obasanjo conducted the election that produced former President

Umaru Yar’Adua in 2007. The process was then adjudged the worst election in the recent

history of Nigeria. President Muhammadu Buhari, who then contested the election on the

platform of the defunct All Nigeria Peoples Party, was a victim of that process. He never

cancelled the process even when it suffered all the yardsticks of a credible and

transparent process.

Contrarily, international observers are witnesses to the ongoing process. For instance,

Commonwealth Observer Group under the chairmanship of former South African

President Thabo Mbeki has rated it “largely peaceful” despite administrative and logistics

hurdles at many polling units. Likewise, ECOWAS Observation Mission described the elections as generally peaceful and transparent.

 

 

As observed in the election results declared, the use of the Bimodal Voters Accreditation

System has brought credibility into the process. With BVAS, APC lost Lagos, the home

state of Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu, to LP. Nobody complained about it. With BVAS,

APC also lost Katsina, the home of President Muhammadu Buhari, to PDP. For them, it

is all well.

What else does Obasanjo want? He is partisan in this process. He endorsed the

presidential candidate of Labour Party, Mr. Peter Obi. He, therefore, lacks moral authority

to provide guidance for the electoral regulatory institution. If his candidate loses the

election, he should accept in good faith and join hands with the new president-elect to

move Nigeria forward.

The collation of election results is still ongoing. INEC should be allowed, even

encouraged, to continue with the process. We, therefore, stand by INEC to conclude the

process in line with its mandate. We also challenge the Chairman of INEC, Prof. Mahmood Yakubu to declare any candidate that satisfies the requirements of the 1999

Constitution winner of the process to avoid another June 12 dilemma or any political

contradiction that can truncate our democracy.

Even though the process is not entirely credible, the solution is not to throw away the

baby with bath’s water. Rather than resorting to extra-legal measures that can lead us to

the regrettable path of people’s aborted mandate as witnessed after the June 12, 1993

election, we urge any aggrieved candidate to seek redress in the Election Petition

Tribunal in line with the provisions of the 1999 Constitution and 2022 Electoral Act.

Abagun Kole Omololu,

Director General,

Conscience of the Yoruba Nation.

February 28, 2023

 

 

Kindly support the growth of journalism in Nigeria
To Receive FREE Newdawn News Online on your phone, text your number to +2348104502834



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *